ORES review tool

百度朗逸在配置上明显逊色于帝豪GL，不论在车载多媒体系统上，还是在舒适配置上都属于入门级别，就更别提ACC自适应巡航这样的高科技配置了。

The ORES review tool is the key user-facing feature of the ORES extension, which provides objective revision evaluation services to automatically rate a revision's characteristics: likelihood it is vandalism, degree to which it might be damaging, likelihood of being good faith, likelihood it will be reverted, and overall quality. The review interface integrates the scores generated by the ORES service into MediaWiki's interface. ORES provides automated scoring of revisions in order to aid editors. For example, ORES can predict whether or not an edit is vandalism, as well as the overall quality level of an article. See ORES' documentation for more information about what types of scoring are available.

The default threshold is deliberately set low to capture almost all vandalism cases (so a number of false positives are also likely to occur). This is in contrast to anti-vandalism bots which set the threshold high to capture only the most obvious vandalism cases (and thus have few false positives). If you do not want to see the flag for most edits, you can simply change ORES sensitivity (see below).

Using ORES

If the ORES extension is activated, you can enable the review tool within your user account by looking under the "beta features" section of Special:Preferences. The review tool will augment Special:RecentChanges and Special:Watchlist by highlighting and flagging edits (with a red-colored r) that need review, because the ORES prediction model judges them to be "damaging". You will also be able to filter these lists by selecting the "Hide probably good edits" option. When you select this option, the review tool will hide any edits that ORES judges to be unlikely to be damaging.

If you review an edit and realize it is not vandalism, you can simply mark it as "patrolled", and the highlighting and flag will be removed.

You can change the sensitivity of ORES in your preferences (under the "Recent changes" tab) to "High (flags more edits)" or "Low (flags fewer edits)". You can also choose to make "Hide probably good edits" selected by default.

FAQ

How does ORES detect damaging edits?

ORES uses machine learning strategies to "learn" what damaging edits look like, by reviewing examples created by Wikipedians through Wiki labels.

Why use the term "damaging" instead of "vandalism"?

"Vandalism" is just a subset of what we want to catch when we're doing RC Patrolling. The word "vandalism" implies deliberate malicious intent. However, a patroller's job is to look for damaging edits whether the damage was actually intended or not. Therefore, referring to the edits that the review tool flags as "damaging" is more true to the kind of work the system is designed to support.

Note that the ORES service also provides a model that focuses on the good-faith/bad-faith distinction ("goodfaith"). It'll be easier to take advantage of that when we deploy the next major change to filtering on the RC page for the review tool. See the Including new filter interface in ORES review tool topic under discussion.

See ORES#Edit quality for more information about how "edit quality" is evaluated in ORES.

巴卡是什么意思	月子里能吃什么水果	异什么同什么	眼睛干涩疼痛用什么滴眼液好	死灰复燃是什么意思
斗是什么意思	叫姑姑是什么关系	双减是什么意思	hp-是什么意思	舒张压是什么
孙红雷的老婆叫什么名字	睡醒手麻是什么原因引起的	denim是什么意思	ca125是查什么的	腹泻吃什么
宣府是现在的什么地方	妖股是什么意思	我的星座是什么	维字五行属什么	世事无常什么意思

傍晚是什么时候hcv9jop0ns7r.cn	小孩说梦话是什么原因引起的hcv9jop1ns0r.cn	天花是什么hcv8jop5ns3r.cn	子宫下垂是什么症状hcv7jop6ns3r.cn	更年期出汗吃什么药hcv7jop9ns0r.cn
房颤有什么危害hcv9jop0ns4r.cn	凌晨四点醒是什么原因hcv8jop3ns2r.cn	dikang是什么药hcv9jop7ns5r.cn	弓箭是什么时候发明的hcv7jop9ns4r.cn	女人更年期有什么症状hcv8jop6ns7r.cn
体检喝水了有什么影响hcv9jop7ns5r.cn	三焦不通吃什么中成药hcv9jop3ns8r.cn	95属什么生肖aiwuzhiyu.com	甲功是什么意思hcv9jop1ns3r.cn	幼小衔接是什么意思jiuxinfghf.com
今年为什么闰六月hcv9jop3ns0r.cn	羊猄皮是什么皮hcv8jop5ns0r.cn	微信头像用什么好hcv8jop7ns1r.cn	老年人吃什么奶粉好hcv8jop5ns9r.cn	伤食是什么意思dayuxmw.com